DEATHWATCH
methodology

How this works

This site publishes factual claims about whether other people’s websites are reachable. That deserves a stated method rather than a vibe, so here it is in full.

The check

Once a day, each tracked board gets a single HTTP request to its homepage from a bot identifying itself as DeathwatchBot/1.0. Requests are sequential with a delay between them — never parallel, never repeated within the same day. Hammering the sites being reported on would be both rude and self-defeating, since the timeouts it caused would show up as failures in this tracker’s own data.

The five statuses

Sites can move back up. A board that returns after being marked down or parked goes straight back to alive, and the change is logged on its page like any other. A tracker that could only move one direction would be wrong over any useful length of time.

Where “On strike” fits

On strike isn’t a sixth status. Every board on that list is still, underneath, either Alive or Quiet — it’s a visibility layer on top of the real status, not a new one. It shows any board that failed its most recent check but hasn’t reached 3 consecutive misses yet, the threshold in the Down rule above. One clean check clears a board off this list immediately. It exists so failures never accumulate out of view — you can see exactly what’s at risk before it’s ever actually called Down.

Quiet has nothing to do with strikes

Worth saying directly, since the two are easy to conflate. Quiet is not a failure state — a Quiet board passes its check every day: fully reachable, HTTP 200, no errors. What makes it Quiet is unrelated to reachability entirely: the top price hasn’t moved in 30 days. A board can sit at Quiet for a year without ever taking a strike, and a board can be racking up strikes toward Down while its status still reads Alive, if the price moved before checks started failing. Strikes track whether a site answers. Quiet tracks whether anyone’s still bidding on it. They are measuring two completely different things.

When a check proves nothing

Plenty of sites sit behind bot protection that refuses unknown crawlers outright. A 403 from a firewall, or a 429 from a rate limiter, means this bot was turned away — it says nothing at all about whether the site is working for real visitors.

Those results are recorded as inconclusive. They don’t count toward the three strikes, and they don’t reset the count either. Without this rule, every board behind a normal web application firewall would be marked down within three days while running perfectly — which would be the easiest possible way for this tracker to end up publishing false claims at scale.

About the prices

Peak and last price are best effort. Every board renders its prices differently, so extraction is a generic scan for the largest currency figure on the page. It will sometimes miss, and it will occasionally pick up the wrong number on an unusual layout.

Where a price couldn’t be read, these pages say not read — never $0. Those are entirely different claims and collapsing them would put a false figure next to someone’s business. Treat every price here as indicative, not audited.

The money figures are not ours

This tracker measures one thing: whether a site responds. It does not measure money, and it has no way to. The Top bid and Reported columns come from afford.bid, an independent tracker that reads boards’ own pages every few minutes.

Their stated method, kept intact here rather than flattened into a number:

None of it is audited. Every figure on this site is a self-reported claim relayed from a third party, and it is labelled that way everywhere it appears.

“$X paid into offline boards” is not an accusation

The headline figure adds up what offline boards said they had taken. It is worth publishing because it is the honest scale of the wave. It is not a claim that anyone stole anything, and this site will not say otherwise.

A board goes offline for ordinary reasons far more often than dishonest ones: a lapsed domain, an unpaid hosting bill, a free tier expiring, a builder losing interest after a weekend. None of that is theft, and a tracker cannot tell the difference from the outside. Where money genuinely was taken and not honoured, that is a matter for the people who paid and, if it comes to it, their payment provider or a court — not for a status column.

So the wording throughout is deliberate: boards are down, parked, or quiet. Money is reportedly paid. Nothing here is described as stolen, scammed, or rugged, because this tracker has no evidence of any of those things and publishing it anyway would be both wrong and actionable.

What this doesn’t claim

Nothing here says why a site went down, whether its operator did anything wrong, whether it made or lost money, or whether anyone was treated badly. Down means it didn’t respond. Parked means the domain lapsed. That’s the whole claim.

Conflict of interest

The person who runs this tracker also runs one of the boards on the list. It is listed, checked, and scored on exactly the same rules as every other entry, with no exemption and no special handling. A deathwatch that quietly excused its own author’s site would be worthless — being on the list is the reason to believe the rest of it.

Getting it corrected

If your board is listed wrongly — you were never down, the tracker hit you during a migration, the price is misread — write in and it gets fixed, with the correction logged on your board’s page alongside everything else. Every status change here carries a timestamp and a reason, so there’s always a record to check against rather than an argument to have.

Contact: info@deathwatch.lol

← Back to the board